Rachael Evans

Review of the three Donors Choose Applications

Review

  • February 20, 2017 at 6:22 PM
  • Visible to public
Donor One: What actually grabbed my attention for this grant was the photo that really corresponded with the title. The grant requestor did a really great job of getting to the point of what was needed out of this grant. It explained what the wireless color printer was going to be used for, and also told how this grant was going to give back to the community.  

Donor Two: The name of this grant is what pulled me into this grant. STEAMing Along on the Titanic made me want to know more about the grant. I believe that this grant requestor did an excellent job at this, however I think that the grant itself was pretty lengthy.  

Donor Three: This grant requestor did a really good job of getting to the point and being short and sweet. I really like how the grant requestor informed the donors what was needed within the grant, how the material was going to be used, and told the donors a little bit about the students.  

Tips:
1: Make sure that you are not too wordy in the grant.
2: Make sure to fully explain the grant, and how it is going to be used.
3: No errors.
4: Professional look.
5: A title to catch the donors attention.