Medium sim ce fidelity

Concept Comparison Routine (FI)

SIM-Content-Enhancement/Concept-Comparison-Routine-FI

Demonstrated competence in instructing a group or class through the co-construction and content instruction using Concept Comparison.

 

Andra Bell

Expert

Awarded badge on February 25, 2020

Medium 0279 leale wedding cropped

Endorsements & Feedback

Feedback

Has successfully demonstrated fidelity of implementation of this SIM Content Enhancement Routine.

Approved by Diane Gillam, SIM Professional Development Leader.
Small 0279 leale wedding cropped abella 5 months ago

Badge Portfolio

Partner with an Active SIM PDer or Specialist

Evidence visible to public
Partner with an Active SIM Professional Developer or Specialist. Post the name of who you will partner with to complete the badge requirements. Visit https://directory.kucrl.org to search for someone near you or contact simpd@ku.edu for additional names (some people are not publicly listed). More Info

SIM for P2G in PA

My trainers are Patty Graner and Diane Gilliam.

Develop a Draft Comparison Table

Evidence visible to public
Develop and post a draft Comparison Table related to content that predicts the instruction of the content with a group or a class. Follow the Get Ready section to prepare the draft. Practice applying the Linking Steps to develop the draft. Post your draft. More Info

My Device Checklist for my 2 drafts 1. Foundational Reading Skills 2. Two Forms of Assessment

Google

Meet Google Drive - One place for all your files

Google Drive is a free way to keep your files backed up and easy to reach from any phone, tablet, or computer. Start with 15GB of Google storage - free.

2 drafts of Comparison Tables 1. Foundational Reading Skills, revised 2. Two Forms of Assessment

Google

Meet Google Drive - One place for all your files

Google Drive is a free way to keep your files backed up and easy to reach from any phone, tablet, or computer. Start with 15GB of Google storage - free.

Co-Construct and Instruct

Evidence visible to public
Co-construct and instruct with the Comparison Table using the Cue-Do-Review steps with a group or class. Follow the Get Set section to introduce the Comparison Table to students. More Info

Use the Comparison Table Routinely

Evidence visible to public
Use the Comparison Table routinely with a group or class. Follow the Go! and Win! sections of the guidebook. More Info

Submit Implementation Portfolio

Evidence visible to public
Describe: •Group/Student (size, level, student characteristics, etc.) •Length of implementation (days, weeks, months, amount of time per day, days per week, etc.) Include artifacts: •Your draft and final devices •Student devices without student names (HALO) •Post your implementation portfolio More Info

Implementation Portfolio for both Comparison Tables and Concept Comparison Routine

•Group/Student: 2 students
•Length of implementation: 2 sessions, 20 minutes each, roughly
*Include artifacts: •My draft and final devices are attached in the above sections under implementation
*Student devices are also posted above.

Submit a Log

Evidence visible to public
Log: •What went well - Why? •What was a challenge - Why? •What you will do next time •What adjustments you made •Ideas generated for issues encountered •Etc._Post your log._*****Optional: Submit a Student Interview (interview a student about usefulness and implementation)***** More Info

Log

•What went well - Why?
The conversation went easily and naturally b/c the concepts compared were known deeply and the first session (PA and Phonics) was used to have the participants think about how they could be very clear with their learners when explaining the difference b/t the two.
•What was a challenge - Why? Finding a different category for the like/unlike characteristics was difficult to come up with b/c they were such discrete skills and their overarching category together seemed to be what the participants wanted to put here.
•What you will do next time - try to define how to create a like/unlike category more clearly.
•What adjustments you made  - I tried to listen and go with the ideas presented by the participants rather than stay stuck on my draft.
•Ideas generated for issues encountered - participants had other additional ideas for extensions, which were interesting for the assessment table.

Engage with SIM Professional Developer

Evidence visible to public
Tell us about your coaching feedback and follow up. More Info

Emails with Diane

Diane and I have emailed back and forth quite a bit regarding these two comparison tables, each time, making revisions after her suggestions.

Dates of emails:
October 31
Nov 1
Nov 4
Nov 5
Nov 22

Video and/or Observation

Evidence visible to public
Be observed by your professional developer in person or by video conducting the Concept Comparison Routine, using the Cue-Do-Review process. Post the Cue-Do-Review Checklist from your professional developer. More Info

Assessments Comparison Table

Google

Meet Google Drive - One place for all your files

Google Drive is a free way to keep your files backed up and easy to reach from any phone, tablet, or computer. Start with 15GB of Google storage - free.

Completion Date

Evidence visible to public
Post the date you completed the requirements for this micro-credential. More Info

Completed 2/10/20

i believe I completed all required documentation.  Please let me know.  Thanks, Andra