Medium sim ce fidelity

Clarifying Routine (FI)

SIM-Content-Enhancement/Clarifying-Routine-FI

Demonstrated competence in instructing a group or class through the co-construction and content instruction using Clarifying.

 

Patricia Waegerle

Learner

Joined badge on November 2, 2017

Medium f07c88fb179da4d42d4364e64e130e58

Badge Portfolio

1. Partner with an Active SIM PDer or Specialist

Evidence visible to public
Partner with an Active SIM Professional Developer or Specialist. Post the name of who you will partner with to complete the badge requirements. Visit https://directory.kucrl.org to search for someone near you or contact simpd@ku.edu for additional names (some people are not publicly listed). More Info

2. Develop a Draft Clarifying Table

Evidence visible to public
Develop and post a draft Clarifying Table related to content that predicts the instruction of the content with a group or a class. Follow the Get Ready section to prepare the draft. Practice applying the Linking Steps to develop the draft. Post your draft. More Info

Full img 8663

3. Co-Construct and Instruct

Evidence visible to public
Co-construct and instruct with the Clarifying Table using the Cue-Do-Review steps with a group or class. Follow the Get Set section to introduce the Clarifying Table to students. More Info

4. Use the Clarifying Table Routinely

Evidence visible to public
Use the Clarifying Table routinely with a group or class. Follow the Go! and Win! sections of the guidebook. More Info

5. Submit Implementation Portfolio

Evidence visible to public
Describe: •Group/Student (size, level, student characteristics, etc.) •Length of implementation (days, weeks, months, amount of time per day, days per week, etc.) Include artifacts: •Your draft and final devices •Student devices without student names (HALO) •Post your implementation portfolio More Info

Full img 8663

Full img 8664

Full img 8666

Full img 8665

Implementation

Description: Group/Student:  21 regular education, 3 special education students, 8th grade Pre-Algebra.  Afternoon class 1:00-1:32 for initial implementation.  Students then used 5 minutes daily during warm up for review.  Included are draft notes, draft, final student work.

6. Submit a Log

Evidence visible to public
Log: •What went well - Why? •What was a challenge - Why? •What you will do next time •What adjustments you made •Ideas generated for issues encountered •Etc._Post your log._*****Optional: Submit a Student Interview (interview a student about usefulness and implementation)***** More Info

Full img 8667

7. Engage with SIM Professional Developer

Evidence visible to public
Tell us about your coaching feedback and follow up. More Info

Coaching Feedback

Janie Brown, my Coach sent me the following feedback on Feb. 8th regarding my video:
"Patricia, what a great video of you modeling LINCS with your math students. You had great evidence of co-construction with your students, and you gave a great Cue-Do- Review with your students. I really liked the wayyou worked with your students to have a great reminding word. You had a list of examples prepared to help themsee how to select one as you went from “fence” to “path” for the word perimeter. I also really like how you showedyour students how to self-test, once they have completed their LINCS Tables."

8. Video and/or Observation

Evidence visible to public
Be observed by your professional developer in person or by video conducting the Clarifying Routine, using the Cue-Do-Review process. Post the Cue-Do-Review Checklist from your professional developer. More Info

9. Completion Date

Evidence visible to public
Post the date you completed the requirements for this micro-credential, click the "Request Feedback" button when you're through. More Info

Completion date

Linc routine presented to class on Feb. 8th, 2018  Evidence posted to website on Feb. 11, 2018.